Delays on the Canoe Canal Path; new phase of Middle Fork Path under way

Two bits of Springfield-y news:

  • If you missed it, today’s Register-Guard reports that construction is starting on the next phase of the Middle Fork Path. This will connect the very nice new first phase of the “path to nowhere” to somewhere — namely Dorris Ranch Park. Construction is supposed to be finished sometime next fall.
  • Commuters who use the Canoe Canal path between Eugene and Springfield will be subject to delays of up to 20 minutes between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. next Tuesday through Thursday (Feb. 21-23). So says ODOT. This has to do with construction of the new I-5 bridge over the Willamette River. Those of you who ride this stretch tell me the regular North Bank Trail under the freeway is still closed, too, leaving the Canoe Canal Path as the only east-west route open under the freeway. So if that’s your route to work, you might want to leave early. ODOT says: Please obey signs and flaggers in the work zone. Of course, you will.
Posted in Links/aggregation, Real news/events | 2 Comments

Cycling with cell phones: Illegal or not?

As I’m sure you know, Oregon has a new cell phone law. It went into effect this past Jan. 1, and it bans (in most cases) talking on a phone or texting while you are driving a car.

But what about this behavior:

Legal or not?

Legal, says the Eugene Police. And it’s got nothing to do with the fact that he’s on a bike path.

This guy is not violating the law either:

Unless a brakeless fixie is illegal. (As we understand it, that’s still a legal gray area.)

But as for operating a cell phone and operating a bicycle at the same time, Eugene Police Lt. Jennifer Bills, who oversees EPD’s  Traffic Team, says  it’s legal: “This does not apply to a bicycle, only a motor vehicle.”

Is anyone else uneasy about this? Let’s set aside the issue of whether it’s safe to ride a bike while you argue with your sister on the phone. That’s not what bothers me.

What gives me pause is the double-standard. There are enough motorists out there who think (wrongly or not) that people on bikes have no respect for traffic laws, are arrogant hooligans or unbearably self-righteous cranks.

So when we get a new law that applies to cars and doesn’t apply to bikes, I wonder if this just does the cause more harm than good. I don’t know. But I’ve wondered.

Sure, I’ve heard the argument that a person riding a bike who is distracted is far less dangerous to society at large than a person driving a car who is distracted. True. I won’t dispute that. But I don’t think that’s a great argument.

I don’t know. I haven’t settled my opinion on this. I’m interested to hear your thoughts?

Posted in a cyclist in a car culture, hazards & safety | 21 Comments

Eugene’s meanest streets: South Willamette

OK, let’s make it official: Willamette Street from 18th to 29th avenues has earned itself a Eugene Bicyclist Meanest Streets Lifetime Achievement Medallion.

The problem with Willamette Street itself is obvious: narrow, busy with cars and no accommodation for bicycles. But we hasten to remind you that to win the Meanest Streets designation there also must be a lack of good alternative routes.

So let’s examine the persistent problems here. In fact, we can go way back to this map drawn by the cunning Spanish Conquistador Hernán Cortés, stymied in his attempt to reach the fabled Shining City of Gold, also known as the Willamette Street commercial strip:

(Oops. I see that Hernán misspelled “Straights of Peril.” Apparently he had little education.)

Anyway, you can see that the Shining City of Gold has formidable natural defenses — especially when faced with intruders from the north.

But the City of Eugene is working on this. You may remember that they had announced plans to hire a consultant to study this stretch of the street, in conjunction with a larger urban planning effort for the neighborhood.

We are told the winning bidder is a firm called DKS. It is based in Oakland, Calif., but has offices in Portland and Salem. They will be tasked with drawing up several alternative scenarios for Willamette Street.

Many dedicated cyclists will certainly hope at least some of the scenarios include bike lanes on Willamette Street itself. That would probably require reducing Willamette from four lanes to three (one in each direction and a center turn lane).

Eugene planners are calling this traffic study: “Willamette Street Transformation.” We are a bit of a skeptic, as you know, so I do think the word “transformation” might be grandiose. But let’s hope they prove me wrong.

But as these things go, it’s not a bad name. For instance, consider the official name of the current Transportation bill in the U.S. Senate — the bill that eliminates dedicated federal spending for bicycle infrastructure and safety. They call it the:

“Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.”

I know what you are thinking. You are thinking, “Isn’t that what they name all the bills?” Yes, it is. In fact, I’m not sure how they know which one they are actually voting on at any given moment.

Congressman: Is this the “Moving Ahead for Progress” bill about child care or the “Moving Ahead for Progress” bill about natural gas fracking?

Aide: No, no. It’s the “Moving Ahead for Progress” bill about soy bean subsidies.

Congressman: Oh, right. So, are we for progress on this one, or against it?

Aide: It’s always hard to vote against progress, sir.

Congressman: OK, then we’re for it. AYE!!

Actually, the U.S. House version of the Transportation bill — similar to the Senate bill but even more egregious — is called:

“The American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act.”

You may have noticed that neither of these names mention the concept of transportation. That is because the people in Congress who name these bills believe that you are as stupid as a post.

Yes, I am digressing.

So. The bids for the Willamette Street study apparently came in at about a quarter of a million dollars. The city initially asked ODOT for $150,000, but “(we) understand that more might be available if needed,” says Kurt Yeiter, a senior transportation planner for the city of Eugene.

Yeiter also tells us:

We suggested that a substantial portion (of the grant money) be used for public outreach and facilitation in the hope that we can reach an amenable community decision for this street’s final design. To do that we need to allow all interested parties to participate and we need to daylight all the issues to be addressed.

Ignoring the unconventional use of “daylight” as a verb, we think this means that folks at the city worry that any talk of changing Willamette Street — such as adding bike lanes, say — could provoke a violent crossfire of letters to editor, much angry shouting at public meetings and a Facebook fan page entitled: “Citizens for the Preservation of Life, Liberty, Prosperity, and the American Way: Keep Your Hands Off Willamette Street!” — with several thousand “Likes.”

Yeiter said he wasn’t sure how long this study would take. But we hear something like this typically takes 16 or 18 months. It’s due to start sometime in the spring. So stop holding your breath and go about your business. Still, we will be interested to see what they come up with.

Posted in a cyclist in a car culture, cycling infrastructure, hazards & safety, the meanest streets, Willamette Street | Tagged | 4 Comments

Take a ride on Willamette Street on Saturday

If you feel strongly about making Willamette Street more bike friendly, you can join others for a ride there tomorrow morning — that’s Saturday Feb. 11.

If you happen to be on the Bike Willamette Campaign e-mail list, you probably got the message. If not, here’s the e-mail, from Paul Moore, owner of the bike shop Arriving by Bike:

Starting this Saturday (tomorrow, Feb. 11) at 9 a.m., join me for a ride on Willamette Street and a stop at a coffee shop to contemplate how great it will be when bicycles are included in the completed street redesign. I plan on starting most Saturdays for the next few months in that manner.

Meet at Moore’s shop, at 2705 Willamette St.

Moore has been a leader in the effort to make sure better bike access is part of city plans being drawn up for the commercial stretch of Willamette Street from 20th Avenue or so down to 29th.

I’d be there for the ride, but I just learned about it and have a prior commitment, as they say. Maybe next week.

Posted in Real news/events, the meanest streets, Uncategorized, Willamette Street | 2 Comments

An app for bicyclists — and for making better bike routes

Today, we celebrate bikes, smart phones and bullet points.

If you:

  • Ride a bike in Eugene;
  • Have an iPhone or an Android phone;
  • Want to potentially improve the experience of cycling around Eugene; and
  • Aren’t the kind of person who suspects Big Brother is lurking behind every bike rack …

then …

There is a free smartphone app you might want to check out. It was developed by a guy named Josh Roll at the Lane Council of Governments.

It might be boring and tedious for me to describe how this app actually works. And since KEZI’s Stacia Kalinoski already did this quite lucidly way back in November, I’ll just refer you to her report for the details.

Stacia did a good job, I think — even though was hard for me to concentrate on what she was saying, because I was so distracted by that enormous basket on the back of Josh Roll’s bike. Did you see that basket? He could have put Stacia Kalinoski herself right in there and done the interview as a ride-along.

But if you didn’t watch the video, suffice it to say the app uses the GPS capability of your smartphone to track how you get from Point A to Point B on your bike. Planners can then use this data to figure out:

  • How to improve bicycle travel in Eugene;
  • Assess how new bike facilities are working;
  • Put together demographic data about cyclists; and
  • Maybe improve route-finding software for cyclists.

What’s that? You don’t believe it? You say this app is really a Big Brother conspiracy? You say if you used this app you would be afraid The Man would learn that you:

  • Roll through stop signs;
  • Occasionally ride the wrong way on Charnelton Street; and
  • Travel suspiciously close to City Councilor George Poling’s house on a regular basis?

No, no, no. I suppose this is a good time to stress — stress — that LCOG says your data is safe with them. Really. I would use the app myself, but unfortunately, here at Eugene Bicyclist we don’t have a smart phone. We have a very dumb phone that we call Blogger Phone.

It has a pretty good camera, though. At least it did. Until the 2-year-old lobbed it across the kitchen the other day. The camera has not been working since. With Blogger Phone down, we have missed a few good pictures around town already, which makes us sad. This is really an emergency for Eugene Bicyclist.

Anyway, since introducing the app last fall, Josh Roll says he has logged about 600 trips from 80 users. He said he will continue gathering data for a few years. He would love for more people to start using the app, though. The more people who use it, the more successful the project will be — and the safer George Poling will be.

So go download the app. And use it whenever you ride. Although Josh Roll does admonish us thusly: “We want typical behavior, so no erratic routes or experimentation.”

That means you. That means don’t turn on the app and then:

  • Drive your car to Portland;
  • Participate in an alleycat race;
  • Ride in circles around George Poling’s house.
Posted in cycling infrastructure, Real news/events | Leave a comment

No, we will not be of any use today

I was going to write something helpful and informative today. I was going to tell you about a new page on the city of Eugene website that attempts to explain sharrows and buffered bike lanes and back-in diagonal parking …

No. What I feel compelled to do instead, I think, is attempt to explain this …

… today’s Notable Bike of the Week.

Excuse me, while I open a beer.

Now, I suppose we should start with the handlebars:

Drop-style handlebars spun upside down I see rather often. But drop-style bars actually installed backwards?

We could call this arrangement: “the African black wildebeest” …

… or maybe we could call it: “Harnish the Highland cow”:

I hope you are aware, by the way, that a seatpost binder bolt is nothing but a marketing gimmick designed to separate you from your hard-earned cash:

Besides, it will save you precious ounces on the cruel climb up the Col du Tormalet. Which may be beneficial because you have removed your derailleur:

Yes, we have addressed the poor man’s single-speed before.

Sure, you could go buy one of these ==>

Of course, that might require buying a new back wheel, too. So it can run into a little bit of money.

Or you just take off your derailleur and shorten up your chain. Voilà. A single-speed on the cheap. It’s also a good way to go if you are not fully comfortable with commitment.

15-tooth cog: You’re not really sure you love me, are you?

Cyclist: What? Of course I love you.

15-tooth cog: Then why do you keep all these other cogs around?

Cyclist: Well, I can’t afford single-cog freewheel right now. I promise, as soon as I can afford it, I’ll get one.

15-tooth cog: You spent more on beer last night than it would have cost to go buy one.

Cyclist: It was my buddy’s birthday!

15-tooth cog: I think you’re afraid of commitment.

Cyclist: Do we have to have this conversation now?

15-tooth cog: And you don’t love me. You never tell me you love me.

Cyclist: I do to!

15-tooth cog: I know all about how you were. You were a real player, flitting from cog to cog without a care in the world.

Cyclist: I took the derailleur off!

15-tooth cog: I really don’t like that one way up at the top, the 28-tooth cog. She’s so easy.

Cyclist: Hey, that’s not fair. Sometimes, she’s just what a guy needs after a hard day.

15-tooth cog: I know you still have the derailleur, too. I saw it in your toolbox.

Cyclist: Look, I admit it. I enjoyed my many gears. But that was then. This is now. Now it’s just you. You’re my only gear. The only one I need.

15-tooth cog: Really?

Cyclist: Eugene is pretty flat — for the most part.

15-tooth cog: I still don’t trust you when you go visit that friend of yours up on College Hill.

Posted in noted bicycles | 3 Comments

A soggy day makes me wonder about bicycling and class; or, fun with data

A couple of weeks ago we had that typhoon, remember. And there were almost as many cyclists about as there were clogged storm drains, which was fun to see. Here’s a pond that developed at 15th and Lawrence:

But as I rode around in that downpour, doing some errands, a thought crossed my mind that surprised me. At first, I didn’t think I would confess it here. But why shouldn’t I?

I’ll back up a minute to mention that I enjoy doing errands by bike, even in the rain. And now that we have the Xtracycle, carrying stuff home is easy.

I brought this Vitamix blender home from Hartwick’s the other day. I picked up a 40-pound bag of dog food another day.

And the day of the typhoon, I went to Hummingbird Wholesale — which is like Costco for hippies — to pick up some big bags of flour and rice and beans and a 2.5-gallon jug of soy sauce, because my children drink it like water.

But riding home in jeans with a bunch of bulk food on my bike in a hammering downpour, I thought: “Wow, I wonder if these people driving past in their dry, warm cars think I’m too poor to own a car.”

And I had a brief moment of self-consciousness about that. Which is weird, because this doesn’t normally happen to me. I usually don’t think about bikes that way. And I don’t care much what anyone thinks of my income. And if I was too poor to own a car, so what?

But I am a product of American society, so I suppose these stigmas soak in over the years — and I suppose they can be hard to shake.

Recently, I came across a chart that showed the portion of “bicycle trips” made in the United States by four different income quartiles. The trips were pretty evenly distributed, with the poorest quartile accounting for slightly more trips.

But the speculation among those who did the study is that among poorer people, those “bike trips” tend to be transportation. Among the wealthier, “bike trips” tend to be for recreation.

You know, golf …

… tennis…

Going to the D.A.C.

But I got wondering specifically about Eugene. I couldn’t find any data about “bicycle trips” — or bicycle errands. But the United States Census Bureau kindly offers us information by city about how people commute to work.

Data from the U.S. government would seem to be authoritative. Although, looking at this table in front of me right now, I see that the Census Bureau reports that 16 people in Eugene commuted to work by ferry boat.

All of them men.

So we will bear that in mind.

Now, you may have heard that Eugene has a pretty high bicycle-commuting rate, compared to the rest of the United States, anyway — somewhere around 8 or 10 percent depending on the data you look at.

Here are the Census Bureau estimates over the three years (2008-10):

Not reflected here is the 1 percent “other” — which we will venture is not, in fact, ferry boats, but rather skateboards.

But let’s get back to the money question. Here’s the likelihood that you ride a bike to work in Eugene depending on your income. For instance, of all the people earning $15,000 to $24,999 per year, 14 percent commuted by bike:

You know, once I start making graphs, it’s hard to stop me.

So as long as we are mucking around on the Census Bureau website, here’s the percentage of people in Eugene in various age groups who use a bicycle as their primary means of getting to work:

And then we can look at bicycle commuters in Eugene by gender:

We can see what this means, can’t we? It means either rich people, old people and women are not getting with program — or it means, more likely, that the demographic bulge of college dudes riding fixies to campus and their jobs at Dutch Bros. is skewing the data.

==========

*All data is from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey “three-year estimate,” covering the years 2008-10 for the city of Eugene.

Posted in Real news/events, weather | 14 Comments